Language selection

Marine transportation safety investigation report M23F0012

Mooring accident
Naval auxiliary supply vessel Asterix
Busan, Republic of Korea

The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. This report is not created for use in the context of legal, disciplinary or other proceedings. See Ownership and use of content.

Description of the vessel

The Asterix (Figure 1) was built in 2010 as a container ship and was converted to a naval auxiliary supply vesselFootnote 1 in 2018. This involved the replacement of the vessel’s forebody and accommodation block, as well as the installation of additional machinery, cranes, ship-to-ship fuel transfer equipment, and a helicopter deck.

The vessel is fitted for the carriage and at-sea transfer of supplies and bulk fuel to naval vessels. The bridge is fully enclosed and is equipped in accordance with the vessel’s certification.

The Asterix is powered by a MAN 7S60 MC-C Mk8, 2-stroke, slow-speed diesel engine producing 16 660 kW (22 340 hp) to drive a single fixed-pitch propeller. The vessel has a gross tonnage (GT) of 23 136, an approximate loaded displacement of 26 000 metric tons, and a service speed of approximately 15 knots.

Figure 1. The Asterix underway (Source: Federal Fleet Services Inc.)
The Asterix underway (Source: Federal Fleet Services Inc.)

The fore and aft mooring stations are equipped with electrically driven mooring winches rigged with high modulus polyethylene (HMPE) lines. The mooring lines were not fitted with mooring pendants. The forward mooring station is fitted with 2 combined anchor windlasses and mooring winches, 1 on either side of the centreline, and an independent mooring winch forward and on the centreline. All 3 winches are controlled from a single point on the vessel centreline, central to the 3 winches. Each winch is fitted with a split mooring line drum and a warping drum.

The mooring deck extends aft on either side of the deckhouse, abeam of which are the fairleads intended for spring lines. Most of the deck is designated as a snap-back zone, marked by a yellow line at the top of the stairs leading down to the main deck.

The vessel is registered to Asterix Inc. of Montréal, Quebec, operated by Federal Fleet Services Inc. of Ottawa, Ontario, and is on long-term charter to the Government of Canada to provide services to the Royal Canadian Navy. While a complement of military personnel is carried on board, the vessel is operated by civilian officers and crew.

History of the voyage

On 28 May 2023 at 0800,Footnote 2 the Asterix arrived at the pilot boarding station off Busan, Republic of Korea, and took on a harbour pilot in preparation for docking at the Busan Naval Base. The master–pilot exchange was completed at 0809. The deck crew manned the vessel’s forward and aft mooring stations; the forward mooring party consisted of the bosun and 2 deckhands. At 0817, 2 harbour tugs were made fast: 1 at the vessel’s bow and 1 at the stern. The Asterix entered Busan harbour and manoeuvred alongside the dock. At 0843, the first mooring line was sent ashore to serve as the forward spring line. The line was a 30 mm HMPE rope routed from the winch’s drum through a pedestal roller with a horizontal inside diameter of 420 mm, a depth of 60 mm, and a vertical opening of 220 mm. The line was then routed to a roller fairlead. Five minutes later, the vessel’s starboard side was in contact with the dock’s fenders, with the forward and aft mooring lines made fast ashore.

At approximately 0846, shore personnel informed the pilot over very high frequency (VHF) radiotelephone that the vessel needed to be moved forward by approximately 20 m. After discussions among the bridge team to clarify the information, at 0849, the master relayed the instruction to the mooring parties. He then ordered the forward mooring party to slack the forward mooring line and the aft mooring party to take up the slack on the aft mooring line. No orders were issued to the tugs, which remained connected to the vessel.

At 0849:55, the main engine was set to dead slow ahead. At 0850:06, the engine reached 40 rpm, and at 0850:19 the telegraph was set to stop. By 0850:21, the engine had stopped. At that time, the vessel was moving ahead at a speed of approximately 0.3 knots and accelerated to an approximate speed of 0.5 knots by 0850:24. The investigation was unable to determine the cause of the acceleration.

At 0850:37, the forward mooring party was ordered to take up tension on the forward mooring line, which they did.

At 0850:48, with the vessel still making about 0.5 knots over ground, the engine telegraph was set to dead slow astern. Shortly thereafter, the deckhand relaying the bosun’s hand signals directed the deckhand operating the winch (the winch operator) to stop and then resume paying out the line. At approximately 0850:56, the forward line parted at the pedestal roller, snapping back and striking the bosun in the chest. About a half second later, the engine reached dead slow astern.

The bosun attempted to go aft to seek help and fell down the stairs leading from the forecastle deck to the main deck. He was attended to by on-board medical personnel and was later transferred to a local hospital where he received treatment for injuries to his chest, lungs, and wrists.

Mooring operations on board the Asterix

The controls for the vessel’s forward mooring winches are located on the centreline, and the vessel’s forward deckhouse is located just aft of the forward mooring winch (Figure 2). The controls and the deckhouse can obstruct the forward winch operator’s view over the vessel’s side and of the spring line’s fairlead. To accommodate this, the forward winch operator relies on another deckhand to relay signals from the bosun to tension or slack the line as needed.

The winch operator was paying out the mooring line as directed by the other members of the forward mooring party while the vessel was moving ahead. The investigation was unable to determine if the winch was stopped when the mooring line parted.

Figure 2. Illustration of the Asterix’s forward mooring station, showing the positions of the mooring line, winch operator (OS1), deckhand (OS2), and bosun (B) as well as the location of the break point by way of the pedestal roller (Source: TSB, based on the ship’s drawing, Arrangement mooring, document no 370-00-433-001 [2018])
Illustration of the Asterix’s forward mooring station, showing the positions of the mooring line, winch operator (OS1), deckhand (OS2), and bosun (B) as well as the location of the break point by way of the pedestal roller (Source: TSB, based on the ship’s drawing, Arrangement mooring, document no 370-00-433-001 [2018])

Electrically driven winch brakes

The ISO standard for mooring winches requires that all electric winches be fitted with

[a]n automatic braking system which operates when bringing the operating device to the stop or braking position, and also when there is no power on the winch. The brake shall be capable of holding a load on the hawser of 1.5 times the drum load and of stopping the drum rotation from its maximum speed without suffering damage.Footnote 3

This standard does not specify a maximum load at which an electric winch should release tension when the automatic braking system is applied. Unlike the manually-applied band brakes, the automatic braking system may not allow the winch drum to release tension at a set point below the Ship Design Minimum Breaking Load (MBL). If the automatic brake is engaged (usually when the operator releases the control lever or sets it to the zero position) and the tension increases on the mooring line beyond its breaking tensile strength, the line may part.

The mooring winches on board the Asterix are fitted with a self-tensioning system, but this system was not in use at the time of the occurrence as it is intended to be used after the docking operation is complete. Following the occurrence, the shipowner had the occurrence winch examined by a manufacturer’s technician, who found that the automatic braking system’s coil and friction lining were damaged. The technician recommended the complete replacement of the brake.

Mooring lines

Mooring lines used throughout the marine industry are typically made from various types of synthetic fibres, such as polypropylene and polyethylene. Over the last 10 to 15 years, HMPE rope, marketed under the names Dyneema, Amsteel Blue, or Quantum (among others) has become a popular choice. HMPE rope has been marketed as being safer and less likely to snap back than non-HMPE rope because the fibres do not elongate under tension to the same degree as other synthetic fibres. This marketing, reinforced by training materials, has created the impression among marine personnel throughout the industry that this rope does not store energy under tension and will not snap back if it parts.

The mooring line used in this occurrence was a 30 mm-diameter, 12-strand, HMPE rope blended with Dyneema SK78 and polyester fibres, with a minimum rope strength of 53.5 metric tons, that was installed in January 2021. The rope was manufactured by Samson Rope under the product name Quantum 12. Following the occurrence, Federal Fleet Services Inc. had the rope tested by a private laboratory; tests confirmed that the rope met the manufacturer’s certified specifications.

The investigation found that, as with other marine personnel throughout the industry, some crew members of the Asterix were under the impression that because the occurrence mooring line was made of HMPE rope, it would not store energy under tension and would not snap back if it parted. This impression was encouraged by the fibre manufacturer’s marketing materials and reinforced by 3rd-party computer-based training provided on board the vessel, both of which claim that HMPE rope is safer than other fibres in the event of a break. However, this may not always be the case; HMPE rope may release a significant amount of energy when it parts.

Related occurrences

The TSB is aware of 1 other occurrence in which an HMPE line parted and snapped back during mooring operations, causing serious injury injuries to a crew member.

Following an occurrence on 02 March 2015, the United Kingdom’s Marine Accident Investigation Branch published investigation report No. 13/2017, addressing the serious injuries sustained by a deck officer on board the liquefied natural gas (LNG) tanker Zarga who was struck by a parted HMPE mooring line during berthing operations at the South Hook LNG terminal in Milford Haven, United Kingdom. The investigation determined that the vessel operator and crew underestimated the risk of snap-back, and the vessel's snap-back assessments did not fully consider all the critical variables, such as the mooring line’s characteristics.Footnote 4 

Safety action taken

Following the occurrence, Federal Fleet Services Inc. indicated that it had modified its operating manuals to forbid crew from making changes to the mooring plan after it had been agreed to with the pilot. Further, vessels in the fleet are required to come to a complete stop alongside a dock before mooring lines are sent ashore, and tug assistance must be used for any vessel movement.

Safety messages

Owners and operators of vessels fitted with electrically driven mooring winches must ensure that crew members are aware of the operating parameters of the automatic braking systems of their winches. If the tension on a mooring line increases as a vessel moves while the automatic braking system is engaged, the mooring line may part, which can result in serious or fatal injuries.

It is important that vessel owners and crews be aware that all mooring lines, including HMPE ropes made with Dyneema SK78 fibres, can snap back if they part or are suddenly released. This can result in serious or fatal injuries.

This report concludes the Transportation Safety Board of Canada’s investigation into this occurrence. The Board authorized the release of this report on . It was officially released on